Fashion & Beauty

What’s Up With That Wacky Candy-Colored Senator?

Democratic senator from Arizona Kyrsten Sinema leaves the Capitol on May 11, 2020. / Photo by Michael Reynolds/EPA-EFE/Shutterstock.

By Nancy McKeon

WE KNOW about virtue signaling, all those little tells that are supposed to convince people of our superior moral character.

What I want to know is, Is Senator Kyrsten Sinema’s bizarre toilette supposed to be “maverick signaling” or just “me-me-me signaling”?

We get it: The Arizona Democrat dresses the way no other person, male or female, in the US Senate or House of Representatives does. Green wigs, pink wigs, halter dresses in July, bandage dresses, silvery glitter dresses in the morning, hot pink mixed with orange (pretty cool, actually), every muscle and bulge on display (although I have to say, the result does not seem particularly sexual or sexually attractive).

Finally, Vanessa Friedman, the chief fashion critic of the New York Times, has focused her sights on La Sinema. The results are not conclusive, but the story is definitely worth a read. Here ’tis:

 

Decoding Kyrsten Sinema’s Style

Sometimes a dress is just a dress. Sometimes it’s a strategy.

Senator Kyrsten Sinema may have been in Europe recently on a fund-raising trip and out of reach of the activists who have dogged her footsteps, frustrated with her obstruction of President Biden’s social spending bill. But despite the fact her office has been keeping her itinerary under wraps, were those protesters able to follow her overseas, there’s a good chance they would be able to find her.

Not just because of her political theater. Ever since she was sworn in to the Arizona House of Representatives in 2005, Ms. Sinema has always stood out in a crowd. And as Ms. Sinema’s legislative demands take center stage (along with those of Senator Joe Manchin, the other Biden Bill holdout) her history of idiosyncratic outfits has taken on a new cast.

As Tammy Haddad, former MSNBC political director and co-founder of the White House Correspondents Weekend Insider, said of the senator, “If the other members of Congress had paid any attention to her clothing at all they would have known she wasn’t going to just follow the party line.”

The senior senator from Arizona — the first woman to represent Arizona in the Senate, the first Democrat elected to that body from that state since 1995, and the first openly bisexual senator — has never hidden her identity as a maverick. In fact, she’s advertised it. Pretty much every day.

Indeed, it was back in 2013, when she was sworn in to the House of Representatives, that Elle crowned Ms. Sinema “America’s Most Colorful Congresswoman.” Since she joined the Senate, she has merely been further embracing that term. Often literally.

Notice was served at her swearing-in on Jan. 3, 2019, when Ms. Sinema seemed to be channeling Marilyn Monroe in platinum blond curls, a white sleeveless pearl-trimmed top, rose-print pencil skirt and stiletto heels: She was never going to revert to pantsuit-wearing banality.

 

Instead, she swept in as a white-cape-dressed crusader for Donald Trump’s first impeachment trial, in January 2020. Modeled a variety of Easter-egg colored wigs — lavender, pink, green — to demonstrate, her spokeswoman Hannah Hurley told The Arizona Republic in May of last year, a commitment to “social distancing in accordance with best practices, including from salons.” (Ms. Hurley specified the wig cost $12.99.) Sported pompom earrings, a variety of animal prints, neoprene, and assorted thigh-high boots. And presided over the Senate on Feb. 23 of this year while wearing a hot pink sweater with the words “Dangerous Creature” on the front, prompting Mitt Romney to tell her she was “breaking the internet.”

Her reply: “Good.”

To dismiss that as a stunt rather than a foreshadowing is to give Ms. Sinema less credit than she is due. “She’s saying, ‘I can wear what I want and say what I think is important and I’m going to have a lot of impact doing it,’” Ms. Haddad said. “She is unencumbered by the norms of the institution.”

Lauren A. Rothman, an image and style accountability coach in Washington who has been working with members of Congress for 20 years, said it’s part of a growing realization among politicians that “you are communicating at all times, because a clip on social media can be even more meaningful than something on national TV.” And that means “thinking at all times about what story you are telling with your nonverbal tools, which means your style.”

As Washington has begun to realize. Conversation with various insiders and Congressologists offered theories on the wardrobe that suggested it was either: a sleight-of-hand, meant to distract from Ms. Sinema’s journey from progressive to moderate to possibly Republican-leaning; or meant to offer reassurance to her former progressive supporters that she wasn’t actually part of the conservative establishment.

Richard Ford, a professor at Stanford Law School and the author of “Dress Codes: How the Laws of Fashion Made History,” said he thought her image was designed to telegraph: “I’m a freethinker, my own person, not going along with convention, so even though I’m a part of the Democratic Party I am representing your interests, not theirs.” (As it happens Ms. Sinema is featured in the book as an example of a woman “unapologetically” bringing a more feminine approach to dress to “the halls of power.”)

Whatever the interpretation, however, no one expressed any doubt that she knew exactly what she was doing. To pay attention is simply to acknowledge what Ms. Haddad called “a branding exercise” being done “at the highest level.” Either way, the senator’s office did not respond to emails on the subject.

Senator Sinema in non-traditional silver talking with Senator Thom Tillis in traditional dark suit in 2020.

J. Scott Applewhite/Associated Press.

Senator Sinema in the U.S. Capitol Building in 2020.
Anna Moneymaker for The New York Times.
Another of Senator Sinema’s wigs, which came in a variety of Easter egg shades. This one matches the large flower on her dress.
Pool photo by Tom Williams.

 

Senator Sinema stood out like a beacon in a bright red halter dress, blue beads, and an apple watch during a news conference in July.
lex Wong/Getty Images.

After all, said Hilary Rosen, the vice chair of the political consultancy SKDKickerbocker, who has known Ms. Sinema since 2011, the senator “used to dress more like the rest of us, in simple dresses” and the occasional suit jacket. But, Ms. Rosen said, “I’ve seen a real shift in the last few years, and I think they way she dresses now is a sign of her increasing confidence as a legislator. She’s not afraid to wear her personality on her sleeve, and that’s rare in a politician. They usually dress for ambiguity.”

There are few places, after all, more hidebound when it comes to personal style than Congress, which long had a dress code that included the caveat that congresswomen were not supposed to show their shoulders or arms in the building. The House changed its rules in 2017, but the Senate hewed to tradition until Ms. Sinema’s election; the rules were actually changed for her.

According to Jennifer Steinhauer’s book “The Firsts: the Inside Story of the Women Reshaping Congress,” Senator Amy Klobuchar, the senior member on the Senate Rules Committee, went to leadership before the last swearing-in to request the rules be reconsidered to reflect the modern world. She knew Ms. Sinema, a triathlete, had a penchant for showing her arms, and believed the new senator “needed to be allowed to wear what she wanted” in her new workplace. Some male senators grumbled, but acceded. (In the end, Ms. Sinema compromised by carrying a silver faux-fur stole to cover her shoulders.)

But for women, Capitol Hill is traditionally a land of Talbots and St. John’s; of dressing to camouflage yourself in the group so it is your words that stand out, not your clothes. As Mr. Ford said, “Women are always subject to heightened scrutiny and criticism,” and in Washington this is even more true.

 

 

 



5 thoughts on “What’s Up With That Wacky Candy-Colored Senator?

  1. Nancy G says:

    I certainly like her style. It’s just her lack of Democratic values I’m concerned with.

    1. Janet Kelly says:

      Hear, hear!

  2. Barbara Kreger says:

    Love V Friedman
    Love N Mckeon

    1. Nancy McKeon says:

      Wow, thanks! I’m in good company too!

  3. Carol says:

    It takes a maverick to make real change… always. Good for her even though I wish she would let it be known what change she is for.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.